Getting Ready For The Common Core Assessments

After having a joke fall flat in my Algebra class, a student leaned over to me and whispered “Tell it to us again, it will be funny this time.”

But this week, at our monthly math department meeting, I presented practice problems for the second time from the Smarter Balanced Assessments.  This time from the training test, a short 8-question test.  From the look on my colleagues face, there was nothing funny about what they saw.

The discussions that followed were not so much about the math as they were about how our students are going to be able to understand and access the technology involved in calculating and entering a solution.  With only a minimal amount of experience on the Chromebooks, would our students remember where to find the calculator?  Would they understand how to group expressions with appropriate parentheses?

On April 22nd and 23rd our school will be taking the new summative (Common Core) assessment by Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC).  We hope the joke will not be on us.

As we near the inaugural assessment, anxiousness grows among the administrators and teachers at our school and, I’m guessing, at many schools across our great state.  Our school wasn’t part of the Field Test of the assessment because we didn’t have enough computer labs, nor did our technology infrastructure support mobile wireless carts.  Chromebooks arrived just this year to provide roughly a 1 to 4 student-to-computer ratio.  Our wireless infrastructure was updated and many teacher’s desktops were upgraded from Windows XP.  We are now ready to go … or are we?

As the Common Core coordinator for my department, I took special care in making sure that our teachers new what was on the practice SBAC exams.  We worked in teams and examined the 7th, 8th, and 11th grade practice exams.  We discussed where our students might struggle with the mathematics, the technology, or both.  I created lists of vocabulary words from the middle and high school practice tests and passed them out to the whole school.  We assembled 2-inch binders with information that would help us transition.  Many PLC mornings were dedicated to being prepared for the assessments.

XKCD

Let the Common Core assessments begin.

The SBAC assessment folks assume that the test takers won’t be under additional mental stress when using “drag and drop” procedures, or using the notepad, or locating the calculator and using it’s numbers and symbols.  But our students, whom many have no computers or internet, have not developed a comfort level where there won’t be significant mental demand just operating the Chromebook.  Many of our teachers also share that discomfort and are making every effort to give students more practice time with the computers.

Are the new assessments a catalyst for change in the use of technology?  Absolutely.  Are we ready for that change? Probably not, but it’s here, and on April 22nd and 23rd a new era of technology in education will drive it’s way into our classrooms.

Posted on March 21, 2015, in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. Assessment iMETer's avatar Assessment iMETer

    Very well said! I have a lot of the same concerns about students being prepared for computer-based assessment, and that’s even with my first-hand knowledge about how SBAC assessments are developed and the nuances within the computer-based platform itself. Even with my direct experience using the platform, I still struggle with the idea that teachers and students are expected to be ready for testing this spring when they’ve only had a limited amount of time to become familiar with the platform and its features. Maybe if the platform only included one or two new item types beyond multiple choice, it would be okay, but given that there are at least a dozen new item types to become familiar with, I think it’s a lot to ask of students right now. Yes, there’s always a learning curve for learning new technology or new information, but I agree that the technology could get in the way of the primary purpose of assessment…assessing mastery of content.

    I’m trying to stay optimistic, but I do expect the overall scores to be incredibly low this year, primarily because of the new technology. However, I hope that over the course of the next couple of years, things will improve. Based on the research studies I’ve been reading, students seem to actually be more motivated to do well on a computer-based testing platform than the traditional paper-based format, so that alone could be a good sign that in time, the technology will no longer be an issue.

    If you’re interested in reading a couple of good articles related to how students feel about computer-based testing, here are a few to consider:

    Chua, Y. P., & Don, Z. M. (2013). Effects of computer-based educational achievement test on test performance and test takers’ motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1889-1895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.008.

    Koong, C.-S., & Wu, C.-Y. (2010). An interactive item sharing website for creating and conducting on-line testing. Computers & Education, 55(1), 131-144.
    doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.010.

    Maguire, K. A., Smith, D. A., Brallier, S. A., & Palm, L. J. (2010). Computer-based testing: A comparison of computer-based and paper-and-pencil assessment. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 14(4), 117-125.

    • Thank you for the article links. Perhaps the novelty of a new type of testing will offset some of the learning curve. It will be interesting on what kind of data is collected from these tests over the next couple of years.

  2. Tim, I feel your pain. Though my kindergarten-aged students will not be taking online tests this spring, I am already beginning to assess their computer skills in hopes of targeting and developing the skills they will need to utilize on the test. Have you run through any of the practice tests on the SBAC website with your students? Have you found them to be useful?
    I’m interested to hear how your students and school does on the upcoming assessments.
    Best wishes for an outstanding teacher/blogger and your students!

  3. Hi Jess,
    Thank you for the comments. Yes, we had one opportunity, for 50 minutes, to run through both the language arts and math practice tests. It may have done more to frighten the students than to provide experience. Given enough time on the practice tests, I think that this generation of students would quickly become comfortable with the format of the questions.

Leave a reply to Assessment iMETer Cancel reply